In a significant policy reversal, General Motors has come out against California’s impending ban on the sale of new gas-only vehicles by 2035. The company, which initially supported the Golden State’s ambitious plan to transition to electric vehicles (EVs) or hybrids, is now backing a congressional vote that could potentially block the mandate. Eleven other states have followed California’s lead in adopting similar regulations.
GM cites slowing EV sales as a primary reason for its change in stance, suggesting that the targets set by the California mandate are unrealistic. “GM believes in customer choice,” the company stated, “and we continue to focus on offering the best and broadest portfolio of vehicles on the market.” Despite its opposition to the specific California mandate, GM has reaffirmed its commitment to electric vehicle production, having invested $12 billion in EV products and manufacturing over the past five years.
However, clean air advocates have accused GM of shifting its position in response to political pressures rather than consumer demand or environmental concerns. The automaker’s about-face has sparked controversy, highlighting the complex issues around the transition to cleaner vehicles and the challenges facing the automotive industry in meeting ambitious emissions targets.
The debate underscores the complex interplay between regulatory policies, consumer preferences, and technological advancements in the automotive sector. As the U.S. automotive market continues to evolve, the outcome of the congressional vote on California’s mandate could have far-reaching implications for both the industry and environmental policy across the country.
